Ecolinguistics, Speciesism, Emotion and Transposition in Multimodal Texts Official Narratives in YouTube

Main Article Content

Diego L. Forte

Abstract

Narratives play a central role in our daily lives. They organize to the possibilities of our culturally bounded material world by teaching the roles, processes and emotional parameters of our particular community. Through social life, we acquire a framework of references to interpret our experiences and negotiate meanings (Bruner & Haste, 1990). But narratives do not stand still in a material support. Since their oral origins, they have move to stone, codex, books, digital formats and countless material ways to transmit them. This is to say they transpose from one media to other and from one genre to other, adapting itself to the possibilities each support/genre offers. Modern media and genres involve nowadays multimodal texts, which means that there is also a movement from one mode to another (Lim and Tan-Chia, 2023: 90). By definition legislative and legal genres constitute a part of the legal framework established by government officials to address complex societal issues (Dimok, 2012: 338). As discourse, they involve a discursive and a social practice but, unlike many other genres, they provide material resources to protect the representations they include. Nevertheless, in their spirit of enforcing behaviours, legislative and legal genres present limitations. The same feature that grants them a high hierarchy also constrains their reach: normative language does not sell; it is not suitable for a mass audience. So, these meanings must be re-written into a broader construction for non-expert auditoriums. In this work we use ecolinguistics as main theoretical framework to investigate the construction and transposition of emotional meanings in food legislation regarding the 2019 Bird flu outbreak in Argentina. We adopt the systemic-functional tools proposed by Kress and van Leeuwen (2005) for image analysis; Ekman & Friesen (1978, 1986) and Ekman (2003) for facial expressions of emotion and Forte (2023a) for music analysis.

Article Details

How to Cite
Forte, D. L. . (2025). Ecolinguistics, Speciesism, Emotion and Transposition in Multimodal Texts : Official Narratives in YouTube. Journal of Digital Sociohumanities, 2(2), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.25077/jds.2.2.98-110.2025
Section
Case Study

References

Barruti, S. (2013). Malcomidos. Cómo la industria alimentaria argentina nos está matando. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI Editores.

Bermúdez N. (2008). Aproximaciones al fenómeno de la transposición semiótica: lenguajes, dispositivos y géneros, in Estudos Semióticos, No.4, available online: [www.fflch.usp.br/dl/semiotica/es] (Accesed: 10/14/2024).

Bruner, J. (2003). La fábrica de historias. Derecho, literatura, vida. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Bruner, J., & Haste, H. (1990). Making sense: The child’s construction of the world. New Jersey: Methuen.

Budassi, I, & Cao, H. (2021). Parlamento y políticas públicas en la Argentina. Estado Abierto. In Revista Sobre El Estado, La Administración y Las Políticas Públicas, 4(3), pp. 63-88.

Dimock, S. (2012). Parliamentary Ethics. In Ruth Chadwick (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics (Second Edition). Academic Press, pp. 338-348.

Ekman, P. & Friesen, W. (1975). Unmasking the face. New York: Prentice-Hall Books.

Ekman, P. & Friesen, W. (1986). A new pan-cultural facial expression of emotion. In Motiv Emot 10, pp 159–168.

Ekman, P. (2003). Emotions revealed. New York: Ballantine Books.

Feng , D. & O’Halloran, K. (2012) Representing emotive meaning in visual images: A social semiotic approach. In Journal of Pragmatics, 44 (2012) 2067–2084.

Foucault, M. (1978). La verdad y las formas jurídicas. Barcelona: Gedisa.

Forte, D. (2023a). El rostro y el lenguaje verbal en la construcción de significado discursivo: una aproximación desde el análisis del discurso multimodal. Tesis de Doctorado, Universidad del Salvador. [https://racimo.usal.edu.ar/8710/] (Accessed: 04/12/2025).

Forte, D. L. (2023b). Music and discourse: A systemic-functional approach for music analysis in multimodal contexts. In Multimodality & Society, 3(1), 69-81. [https://doi.org/10.1177/26349795231153963] (Accessed: 01/12/2025).

Forte, D.L. (2023c). Latin American ecolinguistics: deconstructing discourse studies, coloniality and industrial environmentalism. In Journal of World Languages. [https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2023-0052] (Accessed: 01/12/2025).

Forte, D. L. (2024). Colonialismo, especismo y ecocrí tica en el aná lisis del discurso latinoamericano. Notas sobre la hegemonía humana y el cambio de paradigma. En Refracción. Número 9.

Forte, D. L. (2025). Climate Crisis and Animal Exploitation. Historical Materialism and the Reformulation of Industrial Discourses. In Framing Sustainability in Language and Communication. New York: Routledge.

Haudricourt, A. (2019)[1949]. El cultivo de los gestos. Entre plantas, animales y humanos. Buenos Aires: Cactus.

Hribal, J. (2012). Los animales son parte de la clase trabajadora y otros ensayos. España: Ochodoscuatro.

Hutmacher, F. (2019). Why is there so much more research on vision than on any

other sensory modality? In Front. Psychol. 10:2246. [doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02246]

Kress, G. & van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.

Lim, F. V. and Tan-Chia, L. (2023). Designing learning for multimodal literacy. Teaching Viewing and Representing. London: Routledge.

Newmyer, S. (2011). Animals in Greek and Roman Thought. London: Routledge.

Pezzeta, S. (2018). Derechos fundamentales para los demás animales. Especismo, igualdad y justicia interespecies. In Lecciones y Ensayos, Nro. 100, pp. 69-104.

Raiter, A. (2003). Lenguaje y sentido común. Las bases para la formación del discurso dominante. Buenos Aires: Biblos.

SENASA Official Webpage.2023. [https://www.argentina.gob.ar/SENASA]

Stibbe, A. (2024). Econarratives. Ethics, ecology and the search for new narratives to live by. London: Bloomsbury.

Corpus

SENASA (2019). Resolución 1699/2019. Habilitación de establecimientos avícolas de producción comercial.

SENASA comunica (2022). Prevención de la Influenza aviar en aves de traspatio– Rodolfo Acerbi, vicepresidente del SENASA. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OY6a-8cr988]

(Accesed 08/20/2023).

SENASA comunica (2022). Vigilancia de Influenza aviar en aves silvestres. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tb-cqevmO8g] (Accesed 04/07/2024).